5. Konferenz für Asienforschung

Call for Papers bis 31. März 2025

Nachdem bereits zahlreiche Vorschläge für Panels (größtenteils bereits mit Vorträgen) eingegangen sind, bitten wir Sie nun bis zum 31.3.2025 um die Einreichung weiterer Vorschläge für Vorträge. Ihr Vortragsvorschlag (ca. 150 Wörter) sollte das Thema benennen, einem der aufgeführten Panels² zugeordnet sein und erläutern, inwiefern der eingereichte Vortrag zum Panelthema passt. Vorträge sind sowohl in deutscher als auch englischer Sprache willkommen, es wird jedoch empfohlen, den Vortrag auf Englisch zu halten, wenn das Panel-Abstract in englischer Sprache ist. Ihre Einreichung sollte zudem kurze biographische Angaben beinhalten (ca. 75 Wörter). Wenn Sie kein thematisch passendes Panel finden, besteht die Möglichkeit, Ihren Vortragsvorschlag für Panel 26 einzureichen. Bitte beachten Sie, dass Sie bei Ihrer Einreichung deutlich erwähnen, für welches Panel diese ist und entsprechend Panelnummer und Panelthema mitangeben. 

Die Organisator:innen der Konferenz werden Ihren Vorschlag an die Panelorganisator:innen weiterleiten und gemeinsam mit diesen die Beiträge auswählen. Bis zum 30. April 2025 werden wir Sie über das Ergebnis informieren. Einreichungen (als Word-Dokument) für Vorträge sollten bis zum 31.3.2025 an die folgende E-Mail-Adresse übersendet werden: asien25@uni-bonn.de

Wir freuen uns auf Ihre Vorschläge.

Organisationsteam:
Prof. Dr. Carmen Brandt
Prof. Dr. Kristina Großmann

Call for Papers als PDF-Download³

Die 5. Konferenz für Asienforschung findet in Kooperation mit der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Asienkunde e.V. statt.

Tagungsgebühren

Early Bird Registration (bis zum 15. Juli 2025)*

*Ab dem 15. Juli 2025 erhöhen sich die Tagungsgebühren um jeweils 15 Euro.

Tagungsort

Der Tagungsort befindet sich im Hauptgebäude der Universität Bonn im Regina-Pacis-Weg 3.

Die Tagung findet ausschließlich in Präsenz statt. Zudem kann keine Reisekostenunterstützung durch die DGA oder die Universität Bonn gewährt werden.

Für DGA-Mitglieder, die ein Panel organisieren oder einen Vortrag halten, besteht jedoch die Möglichkeit, eine finanzielle Unterstützung über das Small Grants Programme der DGA⁴ zu beantragen.

Alle Informationen zu einer DGA-Mitgliedschaft erhalten Sie hier⁵.

Panel organisers:
Teresa Jopson (Arnold Bergstraesser Institute, Freiburg)
Anas Ansar (Arnold Bergstraesser Institute, Freiburg) 

The frequency with which the youth have been at the forefront of recent political and social movements across Asia has captured the world’s attention. Movements such as the pan-Asian “Milk Tea Alliance”, the pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong, Myanmar’s spring revolution against the military dictatorship, and the July 2024 student uprising in Bangladesh signal a new wave of youth activism. These movements are characterized by novel patterns, innovative strategies, solidarity dynamics, and transnational digital networks, revealing a unique transformation in both scale and scope. Youth movements in Asia have a long legacy of challenging authoritarian regimes and pushing for societal change. Alongside resistance, movements like Taiwan’s 2014 Sunflower protests and Thailand’s Move Forward party (2023) highlight youth-driven efforts to mainstream progressive issues like same-sex marriage and democratic reform. The digital space has reshaped how young generations have used informational, transnational, visual, and emotional tools via social media to create new forms of domestic and cross-border mobilization and collaboration. At the same time, these movements continue to face significant challenges, as they confront deeply rooted political, economic, and social institutions that resist the changes they seek.

Studying youth movements in Asia against authoritarianism is crucial, given the region’s unique characteristics: a significant youth population, ethnic and religious diversity, varied regime types, political parties, authoritarian resilience, stagnating democracies, and a political culture that is often intolerant of dissent. Understanding these movements provides valuable insights into youth participation and resistance, particularly in the context of post-colonial nation-building struggles. This panel expects to offer transferable lessons with global implications, highlighting the universal fight for democracy and social justice across the world. This panel aims to explore the new wave of youth activism against authoritarian regimes in Asia, focusing on the diverse forms of protest and the violent repression these movements face. We ask, how have recent youth protest cultures evolved in response to political, economic, and social changes in Asia? The panel brings together scholars, particularly early career researchers from the Global South to critically examine the contexts, demands, strategies, and outcomes of these movements. Drawing on various disciplinary perspectives and case studies, the panel addresses youth and student political movements across South and Southeast Asia. By doing so, we seek to trace the transformation of these movements and develop a nuanced understanding of resistance from below. 

Panel organisers:
Venansius Haryanto (University of Bonn)
Ignasius Juru (Floresa.co)
Tamara Soukotta (Erasmus University Rotterdam & Radboud University)

During the two rounds of leadership of the Indonesian president Joko Widodo (Jokowi), several parts of Indonesia experienced the violent cost of the Indonesian government’s ambitions for their Mega Development Projects. These projects were promoted as the government’s good intentions-deeds to further develop and modernize the country, particularly in the eastern part, assumed to be less developed, to bring Indonesia to the same level as the so-called developed countries. In reality, more often than not these projects were experienced by the communities they aimed to develop as violence that brought suffering to the people in the form of land dispossession, displacements, uprootedness, even natural disaster. In the face of the development projects imposed on them and the violent consequences of those projects, the people show resistance in various forms: protests, dialogues, using their bodies to stop the projects, even co-creating alternatives for the government’s plan. Many of these are still ongoing.

One of the examples of the resistance to the violence of those development projects under Jokowi’s administration is the resistance of Indigenous Manggaraian communities in and around Labuan Bajo, Flores, East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia. Labuan Bajo itself is one of the so-called “Ten New Balis” in Indonesia, and it is part of the national investment project in the tourism sector. This has been documented in a series of documentaries released in 2023, titled “Dragon for Sale” by Ekspedisi Indonesia Baru. Following the release of this documentary, two of this panel’s convenors have argued in our recent article, “The Indonesian (Modern/Colonial) Dream of Development” that development projects imposed on the Indigenous Manggaraian communities are in fact manifestations of Anibal Quijano’s coloniality of power, and therefore inherently racist. 

In this panel, from our starting point in Indonesia, we aim to shed light on the stories that speak of the violence brought by development projects in the context of Indonesia.

Panel organisers:
Sandra Gilgan (University of Bonn)
Canglong Wang (University of Brighton)

The Confucian revival in China on academic and political levels since the 1980s has received important scholarly attention in Asian and Chinese studies. Yet there is limited awareness of the grassroots developments in popular Confucianism that have grown in the 2000s, especially when explored through evidence-based research and social science approaches. Ordinary people—technicians, employees, workers, or peasants—have transgressed boundaries towards an area that used to be accessible only to the scholar-literati with an official position, such as Confucian temples and education based on the Confucian classics. 

The most visible educational initiative is classics-reading education for children in so-called ‘study halls’ and ‘academies’. People aim to cultivate modern ‘virtuous persons’, hoping that they will change China for the better (Billioud & Thoraval 2015; Gilgan 2022). Moral education through reading the classics also fuels self-cultivation in the sense of Confucian individuality and citizenship (Wang 2023). ‘Confucian entrepreneurs’ use educational measures to expose their employees to Confucian classics and ritual, reflecting their contribution to the making of the modern citizen of high moral quality that the state desires, and to the construction of a Chinese capitalist ethic (Lan Jiang Fu 2022). Social science approaches to Confucian studies has already been recognized as one of the top ten academic highlights of 2023 in China, while this new trend is still gaining momentum in Europe. Therefore, we bring researchers together to critically discuss the variety of popular references to Confucianism—such as education, spirituality, business, and local politics. We welcome contributions from area, heritage, citizenship and religious studies, from anthropology, sociology, and other fields of study that use evidence-based research on popular Confucianism in China and beyond. 

In a workshop, we invite scholars to prepare small inputs on their specific research topics and address questions such as: 

• What are the roles and functions of ‘revived’ Confucianism? What do people need or use it for? 
• Which ideas about ‘tradition’, ‘history’, ‘heritage’ and other ‘pasts’ prevail in the field?
• What tensions can be identified between the past, present and future? Between ideals and reality? 
• How do the actors in the field relate to family, society and politics? 

 Along all cases, we will discuss and reflect on methodological opportunities and challenges: 

• What are the (methodological) challenges and opportunities of applying social science approaches to Confucian studies? 
• How can interdisciplinary approaches to Confucian studies be achieved by integrating humanities and social sciences?

Panel organisers:
Friederike Trotier (University of Passau)
Yueran Tian (University of Bielefeld)
Huy Tran (University of Bielefeld)

For decades, cities in East and Southeast Asia have been undergoing rapid urbanization boosted by the process of infrastructure expansion. Such a process includes not only physical networks of transport, housing, and digital connectivity but also entangled networks of actors, knowledge (know-how), and governing practices. Looking at different kinds of infrastructure in the urban landscape sheds light on their crucial role in shaping economic developments, mobility, and how people live and work. Moreover, access to infrastructures in urban cities is not always universal. Studies have shown that different social groups and communities are hindered from having full access to certain infrastructures due to factors such as locations, financial disadvantages, political influences, gender, race and ethnicity, etc. As a result, infrastructural development and access have far-reaching impacts on social inequality and stability.     

This panel examines such an uneven landscape of urban infrastructure in cities across East and Southeast Asia. Integrating perspectives from urban studies, sociology, social anthropology, political geography, and area studies, the panel aims to explore the emergence and development of different infrastructures as part of the process of urban expansion through different case studies including digital infrastructure for works and services, urban heritage, migration and arrival infrastructure, etc. Such a focus on urban infrastructures sheds light on: (1) what infrastructure developments tell us about the shaping of inclusion and exclusion in urban spaces in regions where urban expansion has been happening at a rapid speed, (2) the contrary between heavily-concentrate/prioritized and overlooked spaces and communities, (3) how different actors and communities navigate the shifting urban landscapes and the process of infrastructural expansion, and (4) the broader and multifaceted political and public discourses and political economies surrounding infrastructural expansion in the cities. 

By bridging discussions on infrastructure, labor, digitalization, and urban knowledge production, this panel highlights the uneven geographies of urban transformation in East and Southeast Asia and aims to potentially develop a collaborative publication project. We invite contributions to this panel that explore the following aspects:

• The emergence and development of new and unconventional infrastructures as a result of the expansion and development of cities and urban spaces  
• Unseen and overlooked aspects of urban growth and infrastructure development (including but not limited to marginalized spaces, communities, and social groups)
• Which sites/ spaces are revitalized or turned into heritage while others remain neglected?
• The intersection of urban infrastructural expansion (e.g. housing, transportation, digital networks) with labor, labor conditions, cultural and community networks

Panel organisers:
Rohini Mitra (University of Bonn)
Antje Missbach (Bielefeld University)

South and Southeast Asia, home to nearly 20 countries and more than a third of the world’s population, have historically been hotspots for highly diverse migrant and refugee movements. Over the past century, conflict, war, and (violent) political regime change in countries of the region, including Myanmar, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Sri Lanka, and Bangladesh have led to large- scale displacements. The majority of these displaced populations are also hosted within the two regions, including in Malaysia, Thailand, Bangladesh, India, and Indonesia, among others. For instance: the multiple armed rebellions and military coups in Myanmar over the latter half of the 20th century has created numerous refugee groups in other countries of the region including the Chin, Karen, Mon, and most recently, the Rohingya. Next to the forced migration movements in South and Southeast Asia (and beyond), there are also large-scale labour migration movements, with notable migration corridors emerging between and across various countries of the region including Singapore, Philippines, Indonesia, Malayasia, Bangladesh, India, and Nepal, among others. Over the past decades, labour migration in various sectors, and of varying skill-level has become an important part of countries’ economic, socio-political, and cultural development. Last but not least, in recent years, long-term and periodic environmental factors that are instigated by climate change, such as rising sea levels, floods, and cyclones, have also started to shape patterns of temporary and long-term displacement within and beyond both regions. 

This panel aims to explore causes and consequences of contemporary migration in the countries of South and Southeast Asia. We are particularly interested in contributions that address: 

• Emerging patterns of migration within the region, and their socio-economic and political consequences for nations and the region as a whole 
• Current developments in forced migration and displacement within specific countries, and the region as a whole
• National and regional governance, legal processes, and policies towards various migration movements
• Lived experiences of displacement and migration in contemporary South and Southeast Asia including particularities of gender, youth, elderly, disabled, and other marginalized groups
• Host-refugee relations and impact of forced migration movements on host societies, socio-cultural and religious solidarities 
• Multinational/onward/transit mobilities of migrants and the consequences for migration governance
• Politics of resettlement, sponsorship, and return within and beyond the region

Panel organisers:
Ningje Zhu (University of Bonn)
Katrin Bonarens (University of Würzburg)
Sina Hardaker (University of Würzburg)

In an era of rapid digital transformation, China’s evolving digital infrastructure—encompassing data-driven surveillance systems, e-commerce and fintech ecosystems, social media platforms, and e-government arrangements—plays a pivotal role in reshaping political authority, economic relations, and societal oversight both domestically and globally. At home, the Chinese Party-state integrates these socio-technical tools into everyday life, thereby reconfiguring boundaries between the public and private spheres and fostering new relationships between government agencies, corporate tech giants, and citizens. From the digitalization of public services to the incorporation of surveillance and memory-shaping mechanisms, these infrastructures expand and entrench the state’s capacity for control while also creating spaces for negotiation, adaptation, and contestation among various social actors.

Beyond China’s borders, initiatives such as the Digital Silk Road (DSR) exemplify how digital infrastructure investments—involving major technology players like Huawei, Alibaba, Tencent, ByteDance, and others—are impacting economic growth, geopolitical alignments, and development paradigms across Asia. By exporting technological models, e-commerce platforms, and digital standards, China extends its influence over local markets and governance structures, raising critical questions about digital sovereignty, economic dependencies, and the emerging architecture of international relations. Governments in Asia are increasingly entering strategic partnerships to adopt Chinese digital platforms and infrastructure, influencing sectors from retail to education and shaping the future of regional platform economies. 

This panel seeks to integrate these domestic and transnational dimensions, offering interdisciplinary perspectives on the interplay between technology, ideology, power, and economic activity. We invite presentations that explore how China’s digital governance model not only redefines state-society relationships at home but also reconfigures power dynamics and development trajectories regionally and globally. Through case studies and policy-oriented research, participants will help deepen our understanding of how digital transformations simultaneously enable new forms of authority and avenues of resistance. 

Panel organiser:
Tobias ten Brink (Constructor University)

China’s transformation from a poor, peripheral country to a major global power has been unprecedented in its scale and speed. Like other major powers before it, China’s ascent has placed it at the center of global economic, social and political processes. Trying to understand the implications of China’s rise, this panel explores whether China is emerging as an empire and whether it adapts amidst a global order that is increasingly informed by geopolitics. While empire-building in the Chinese case appears to be predominantly economic in nature, rather than through military coercion and conquest, this panel examines two sets of processes that we argue are central to the emergence of a novel form of empire: (a) multiple forms of autonomy building to minimize dependencies from incumbent powers or external critical infrastructure and knowledge; and (b) processes that intentionally or unintentionally increase dependence of others, thereby creating conditions for the establishment of exercising authority abroad. Moreover, by examining preference formation and policy learning under authoritarianism, the papers in this panel aim to identify the domestic mechanisms through which Chinese international practices are adapted and how these shape empire building and processes of peripheralization. 

In short, this panel investigates whether and how China is learning to become an empire under the conditions of a global order in transition. 

Panel organiser:
Vanessa Tkotzyk (University of Frankfurt)

Since the global COVID-19 pandemic in 2019, Japanese outbound migration finds itself on a downward trend. As a result, the number of Japanese nationals residing abroad dropped from 1,410,356 in 2019 to 1,293,565 in 2023 (Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs 2024). However, statistics show that some migration destinations were so predominantly desirable in the last couple of decades that large Japanese communities formed in certain places in the world – one of which being Germany. In 2024, Germany is still the main destination for Japanese nationals in the EU with a history of great Japanese investment, especially in the Rhine-Ruhr Area. As a result, the impact of the Japanese expansion on the local socio-economic landscape is clearly visible to this day. However, there is hardly any scientific literature or previous research on the Japanese presence in Germany as a whole, let alone on the driving factors of Japanese nationals and companies and their migration or relocation choices. This is mostly because the assumed homogeneous Japanese community in Germany consisting of expatriates and their families was perceived as an unproblematic model minority with little scientific significance and their numbers were relatively small in comparison to other migrants (Tkotzyk 2024). In a time in which Germany continuously struggles to encourage new foreign investment and attract foreign skilled workers, those who shaped geographic parts of Germany’s main industrial area need to be considered. Thus, this panel sheds light on what Japanese (highly skilled) individuals and companies find desirable about Germany as a potential destination for their settlement.

This panel follows the Japanese diaspora’s path in Germany from its beginnings in line with the economic investments in the Rhine-Ruhr Area over the diversification of the community. It combines micro-, meso-, and macro-level approaches, taking the economic perspective and the personal perspective of individuals into account while also considering facilitating factors such as state programs or local initiatives. On the whole, the panel aims to lay the groundwork for three main insights for policymakers and economic actors. 1) It sheds light on business locations in Germany as Japanese business hubs and thus provides insights into the branch strategies of Japanese companies. 2) It analyses the growing heterogeneous community, thus illuminating the needs of highly skilled Japanese migrants and Germany’s desirability as a potential migration destination. 3) It considers binational programs and initiatives, thus giving insights into possible facilitating factors.

Panel organisers:
Chen Qi (University of Freiburg)
Anastasia Kostromina (University of Würzburg)
Leshan Li (University of Heidelberg)

Chinese feminism has developed through complex historical trajectories, influenced by transnational ideas and shifting socio-political conditions. In the Late Qing Dynasty, male intellectuals framed women’s liberation as part of a nation-saving agenda, drawing on Japanese and Anglo-American feminist thought. Since the establishment of the Chinese Communist Party in the 1920s, feminist concerns were often subordinated to revolutionary goals and class struggles. The reform era of the 1980s brought neoliberalism and Western feminist theories to China, sparking critical reflection on the socialist feminist legacies of the Mao era. Today, grassroots activists and ordinary women, empowered by the Internet and an increasing awareness of regional and national identities, continue to reshape “Chinese feminism”.

This panel examines the intersections of feminism, marginalization, and identity in Chinese and global contexts through an interdisciplinary lens. By analyzing cultural representations and social dynamics, it explores how Chinese women across diverse settings resist traditional gender norms, navigate complex power structures, and redefine spaces of empowerment. Aligning with the conference’s focus on interdisciplinary exchange, this panel situates “Chinese feminism” within its historical, cultural, and socio-political contexts. It explores how Chinese women navigate broader systemic changes and transformations, inviting critical reflections on modernity, cultural identity, and power dynamics. 

Panel organisers:
Nguyễn Hoàng Duy (University of Hamburg)
Melina Kaiser (University of Hamburg)

The diverse topography of much of mainland South and Southeast Asia reflects the broader dynamics of majority and minority populations in the regions: On the one hand, fertile lowland areas sustain large populations and economic development with their accessible terrain, which facilitates agriculture, trade, and transportation. In contrast, vast highland regions, characterized by rugged and elevated terrain, have historically enabled its populations to elude centralized governmental control by creating natural barriers against lowland forces. Consequently, the social structures of these regions differ significantly. Lowland areas tend to accommodate more sizeable settlements and facilitate government intervention through taxes or policy enforcement, contributing to these regions’ dominance in administrative and economic activities. Conversely, the relative isolation of highland areas results in smaller communities that tend to prioritize subsistence living and cultural autonomy, reflecting a deeply rooted resistance to external influence. As a result, significant power hierarchies exist within South and Southeast Asia, often privileging majority groups across various spheres, including society, culture, and politics. 

However, while many prevailing narratives tend to depict highland groups as homogeneous entities, historical realities are far more nuanced. Nowadays referred to as ethnic minorities, these groups comprise highly diverse peoples with distinct histories and cultural identities. Furthermore, these groups possess strong agency, proactively shaping their historical trajectories rather than remaining passive subjects of dominant narratives. They actively participate in negotiating the relationship with what is nowadays regarded as the majority population. In fact, numerous historical examples illustrate highland communities asserting their power and challenging lowland authorities, emerging as formidable adversaries capable of challenging or resisting central lowland rule. Consequently, lowland governments frequently sought to extend their influence into highland areas, driven both by the desire to extract resources and by strategic considerations, as securing control over these often unruly regions served to bolster the lowlands’ overall security and stability.

This panel invites contributions that examine the relationship between flatlands and highlands, represented by different actors in various parts of mainland South and Southeast Asia and at different points in time. In particular, it welcomes analyses of the numerous attempts made over time to leverage the relationship between highland and lowland populations, along with the various strategies employed to govern them. These contributions collectively provide a multi-faceted picture that represents some of the diverse realities and histories that have, over time, intertwined to create a complex trajectory of flatland-highland interaction and majority-minority dynamics across mainland Asia. 

Panelorganisatorin: 
Ummü Zor (Universität Bonn)

Die zweite Hälfte des 20. Jahrhunderts war von kriegerischen Auseinandersetzungen geprägt. Ehemalige Kolonialmächte und neue Global Player versuchten, durch militärische Interventionen ihren Einfluss in verschiedenen Gebieten zu erhalten bzw. auszuweiten, und stießen auf den Widerstand der lokalen Bevölkerung. Der Vietnam- und auch der Korea-Krieg stellen beispielhafte Konflikte dar, welche über einen langen Zeitraum hinweg nachwirkten. Aber auch die ethnischen Konflikte auf Zypern beschäftigten die internationale Politik, bevor eine für die Konfliktparteien (un)befriedigende Lösung ausgearbeitet werden konnte. 

Wie geht man heute in den jeweiligen Regionen bzw. Ländern mit diesen Ereignissen um? Auf welche Weise erinnert man an diese? Welche Gründe stehen hinter diesen Erinnerungspraktiken? Solche und ähnliche Fragen bieten spannende Ausgangspunkte, um zum Beispiel Spielfilme einer genaueren Analyse zu unterziehen. Maurice Halbwachs (1877–1945) ist einer der wichtigsten Pioniere, die sich mit Erinnerungskulturen beschäftigten. Seine Arbeiten legten im westeuropäischen Raum den Grundstein für die Wissenschaft zur kollektiven Erinnerung, welche insbesondere in den 1980er Jahren florierte. Ein weiteres zentrales Werk ist auch Lieux de Mémoire von Pierre Nora, welches angesichts des damaligen Trends der Musealisierung eine breite Rezeption erfuhr. In den folgenden Jahrzehnten erlebten die Memory Studies theoretische Erweiterungen, zum Beispiel durch die Arbeiten von Aleida und Jan Assmann. 

Wie sieht jedoch die mediale Geschichtsaufarbeitung in den asiatischen Regionen/Ländern aus? 

Diese Panelsektion richtet sich insbesondere an Nachwuchswissenschaftler:innen, auch Studierende, die sich mit audio-visuellen Medien und ihrer Darstellung von Geschichte beschäftigen, um somit einen Beitrag zur Forschung im Bereich der Erinnerungskulturen in asiatischen Ländern leisten möchte. 

Panel organisers:
Désirée Kaiser (University of Bonn)
Julita Oetojo (University of Bonn)
Yusheng Bai (University of Bonn)

This panel explores the intricate ways in which cultural narratives and symbolism shape heritage practices across diverse regions of Asia and the Middle East. By examining specific case studies from Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, and China, the panel investigates the interplay between socio-cultural resilience, identity formation, and memory preservation in the context of heritage.

Désirée Kaiser examines Saudi Arabia’s heritage practices through the lens of ritual and resilience. Her presentation Ritual and Resilience: Socio-Cultural Narratives in Saudi Arabia’s Heritage Practices highlights how cultural narratives are mobilized to foster a sense of continuity and socio-cultural identity in a rapidly modernizing society. She delves into the integration of traditional rituals into the Kingdom’s contemporary Vision 2030 strategy, illuminating the ways in which heritage serves as a bridge between past and future.

Julita Oetojo focuses on the Indonesian Ikat textile tradition in her presentation Woven Symbols: Cultural Narratives in the Ikat Textile Traditions of Indonesia. Her analysis reveals how these textiles, rich in symbolic meaning, reflect and perpetuate cultural narratives tied to community identity, intergenerational knowledge, and regional history. The study shows how these crafts are not only aesthetic but also a vital medium for sustaining intangible cultural heritage.

Yusheng Bai explores the worship of Shun, a sage king from ancient Chinese mythology, as a heritage practice in Jiuyi Mountains, Hunan, China. His presentation Memory of Sage King: Worshipping Shun as Heritage at Jiuyi Mountains in Hunan, China unpacks how collective memory and cultural identity are preserved through ritualistic practices and the ongoing veneration of historical figures in local traditions.

Together, these presentations reveal the shared and divergent mechanisms by which cultural narratives underpin heritage practices across vastly different contexts. By bringing together scholars working on diverse regions, this panel fosters an interdisciplinary dialogue on the ways cultural symbolism and narratives serve as pillars of heritage preservation and cultural resilience. It invites participants to reflect on the broader implications of heritage practices for socio-cultural cohesion and identity in an increasingly interconnected world.

Panel organisers:
Retno Widyastuti (HVF Ludwigsburg)
Alexander Loch (HVF Ludwigsburg)

The migration of professional health workers, particularly nurses and caregivers, is a critical global issue as healthcare systems struggle to meet rising demands. There are 29 million nurses globally. Yet, the World Health Organization (WHO) projects a shortage of 4.8 million nurses and midwives by 2030, with the most severe gaps in developing countries, where health systems are already under-resourced and overburdened (WHO 2024). Asia, especially the Philippines, India, Vietnam, and Indonesia, have become prominent suppliers of nurses and caregivers to countries facing healthcare workforce shortages due to demographic change—including Japan, Germany, and the United States (De Lorenzo 2024, Bludau 2024). For example, the Philippines provided approximately 240,000 nurses to OECD countries, with an annual outflow of 15,000–20,000 nurses (Buchand & Catton 2020), while India and Indonesia are rapidly emerging as key partners in bilateral agreements to address labor shortages. 

This interdisciplinary panel will examine the Asian nurses’ migration dynamics; areas include the migration drivers, expectation management, healthcare demands, alongside challenges like brain drain and remittances in origin countries, also acculturation, integration, and discrimination issues in destination countries. Case studies from Germany, such as trainee recruitment from Vietnam (2019), placement agreements for nurses from Indonesia (2021), the German-Indian Migration and Mobility Agreement (2024), also prominent examples from Asian countries, such as the Japan Economic Partnership Agreements (JEPA), illustrate the interplay of policies, recruitment practices, and worker experiences. The panel invites comparison and critical reflection of efficiency and cross-cultural compatibilities, e.g. from 2022 to August 2024, 187 Indonesian nurses came to Germany through the Indonesia-Germany Triple Win Program, while, in comparison, 875 Indonesian caregivers and 47 nurses have been placed through the JEPA (BP2MI, 2024). 

While destination countries gain skilled workers, origin countries face care gaps that strain fragile health systems. By addressing ethical recruitment, gender dimensions, and (re)integration obstacles of health workers crossing borders, the panel also will highlight pathways to mitigate global health workforce shortages and ensure sustainable health systems. These discussions align with achieving SDG 3 (good health and well-being) and SDG 8 (decent work and economic growth). Shared responsibility and ethical policies are critical to mitigating shortages and building resilient healthcare systems globally. The comparative analysis of the experiences of Asian Nurses in the German Health Care System may provide social scientists, migration researchers and decision-makers in the medical sector an evidence-based understanding of potentials and challenges in German-Asian co-operation.

Panel organiser:
Renée Ford (Aarhus University)

This topic aims to share current international, interdisciplinary research on embodied contemplative practices in Asia and explore the practical components and the larger impact these practices have on the social and environmental communities affected by individual contemplative activities. One might define these practices as “contemplative” in the same vein that Richard Davidson defines “contemplative practices are practices that involve some form of mental training and may also involve physical movement or dialogue-based exercises. Although contextualized differently among the traditions that use them, contemplative practices are typically viewed as practical methods to bring about a state of enduring well-being or inner flourishing.” Much research on contemplative practices investigates the mental engagement of the process. 

The presenters, here, extend what contemplative practices include by focusing on the performative, embodied components of doing in activities that are frequently understood to be contemplative in nature or at least hold some meaning like pilgrimage to a holy site or making offerings to a temple. This perspective opens contemplative studies research to also investigate the intersections between the physical body, environment, and extended communities who also participate in the same activities. What are the social, political, and environmental implications for embodied contemplative practices in Asia? How are practices performed by contemporary Asians and how does this impact the spaces around them? By looking at embodied contemplative practices on a broader scale, we re-imagine what it means to perform these acts and thereby, address new perspectives on how contemplative practices affect not only the individual but also the environment and communities that are affiliated with these actions. 

One session focuses on art and performance in contemporary Asian research. Two papers explore different dance forms in Nepal and India, and the third paper addresses an art form called maṇi carving. These three papers are inter-disciplinary through incorporating methods such as ethnography, artistic, and philosophical that include emic perspectives and presentations alongside embodiment theories. 

The second session emphasizes space and place, in which the presenters approach embodied contemplative practices. One presentation is on the Chinese view of ganying, stimulus-resonance, and agency of Chinese Buddhists. The other two presenters raise questions on how western theories on embodiment and contemplative practice do or do not fit indigenous understandings of Buddhist practice in South India or how asymmetrical power between space and individuals may arise. Together, they present a wide conversation on how contemplative practices might function for communities and their spaces.

Panel organiser:
Helen Hess (University of Zurich)

This panel shall focus on the histories of Chinese/Sinophone (i.e. Chinese-speaking) communities and stories told by Chinese/Sinophone individuals in a selection of European cities. Amsterdam, for instance, is home to an ‘old’ Chinese diasporic community with one of the very earliest Chinatowns in Europe, and mainly populated by Cantonese speakers from Southern China, but also from Indonesia, as it was a Dutch colony. Prato, on the other hand, with allegedly the highest rate of registered residents of Chinese nationality in Europe, is home to more recent, but very large Chinese/Sinophone communities, mainly from Wenzhou. Paris is home to different Chinese/Sinophone communities, including early migrants from Southern China, refugees from the former French colonies in Southeast Asia, as well as more recent communities, for instance, those from Northeast China. As recent research has shown, there is not one Chinese/Sinophone community in Europe, but many different ones. By focusing on specific cities rather than countries, we apply a sub-national framework, paying tribute to the diverse situations across Chinese/Sinophone communities in Europe. The situation of individuals of Chinese descent living in Europe varies strongly, depending on different factors and conditions that intersect with each other, such as their city of origin and/or of arrival, the time of migration, their class background, their age/generation, their gender, their mother tongue, etc. 

Against this background, this panel opts to critically reflect on concepts such as Chinese diaspora, Overseas Chinese, and Sinophony, discussing their respective potentials and limits. Methodologically, we mainly draw from the anthropological concept of storytelling, creating a transdisciplinary dialogue between oral, visual, and text-based analysis. Combining individual stories with discourse and media analysis, we aim to think beyond juxtaposing official history versus individual experiences, trying to find new ways of framing the kaleidoscopic narrative(s) of Chinese/Sinophone individuals and communities in Europe. Such an endeavor is particularly important at a time when political fronts are hardening between global players—with Chinese living abroad being caught in the middle—media reporting is one-dimensional to a large extent, and hostility towards people of Chinese descent is on the rise.

Panel organiser:
Christian Lemuel Magaling (University of Bonn)

This panel enjoins scholars working on/in Asia using different materials from printed texts, material culture, processes of printing, modes of distribution, and social movements circulating within and through Asia. The discussion aims to cover different aspects of print-making from industrial, indigenous, textual, and visual at the turn of the century during the period late modernity from a wider lens between the late 18th to the early 20th century by looking at printmaking as a global process. By treating it as a process aside from being an output that needs interpretation, the discussion aims to involve various aspects of creation, and distribution through intraregional publication from original to translated texts, and to the unraveling of archival sources on the lives of people who worked in print shops, and publishing houses organized in cooperatives and trade unions, to highlight human aspects and artistic output of print in Asian society. In exploring aspects of translation, materiality, productivity, and social aspects of print, this panel aims to widen the scope of the discussion of print and to investigate its process and its implication on late modernities in Asia before the advent and rise of digital media.

Panelorganisator:
Alessandro Gullo (Universität Bonn)

Die Idee und die Wichtigkeit dieser Art von Austausch beruht auf den Grundlagen, dass die Asienwissenschaften sowie Nachwuchswissenschaftler:innen aktuell vor einer Vielzahl an Herausforderungen stehen:

• Der Zugang zu Quellen und Feldforschung unter geopolitischen Spannungen
• Wachsende bürokratische Hürden
• Veränderungen der Asien- und Regionalwissenschaften in den letzten Jahren
• Rolle europäischer Wissenschaftler:innen in asiatischen Ländern – Machtverhältnisse und Ungleichheiten
• Wachsende Notwendigkeit von Asienexpertise in europäischen Ländern in Anbetracht der expandierenden Rolle asiatischer Wirtschaften

Diese Themen betreffen insbesondere Nachwuchswissenschaftler:innen, die sich noch orientieren oder in der Promotionsphase befinden. Unter Berücksichtigung dieses Hintergrunds soll der Austausch dazu dienen, Lösungen zu Herausforderungen zu finden und die Orientierung der einzelnen Betroffenen zu unterstützen. Im besten Fall sorgt die Vernetzung und der Austausch zu der Formierung von Peers und einer Erweiterung der DGA-Nachwuchsgruppe Asienforschung. 

Der Workshop zielt darauf ab, Nachwuchswissenschaftler:innen eine Plattform zu bieten, um sich über den aktuellen Stand ihrer Arbeiten und den komplexen und aktuellen Entwicklungen in Asien auszutauschen. Dies soll über institutionelle und disziplinäre Grenzen hinweg geschehen. Das Besondere dieses Workshops ist, dass neben dem inhaltlichen Fokus (Forschungsfragen, Theorie etc.) den Teilnehmenden auch Raum gegeben wird, sich über mögliche bürokratische Hürden und eingeschränkte Zugriffe zu Ihren Forschungsfeldern auszutauschen. Hierbei kann es sich konkret auch um Beratung und Unterstützung im Rahmen von Visa-Anträgen handeln. Die konkrete Umsetzung soll im Rahmen eines World-Cafés geschehen, um einen tiefgreifenden Dialog der Teilnehmenden zu fördern, während genug Raum für eigene Ideen und Ansätze zur Lösungsfindung gegeben wird. Auf dieser Basis sollen zunächst einmal Themen in Bezugnahme auf einen regionalen Austausch (Südostasien, Zentralasien, Ostasien etc.) diskutiert werden. Anschließend wird der Fokus in einer zweiten Runde auf aktuelle Probleme sowie Herausforderungen in bürokratischen und organisatorischen Prozessen gelegt, um gemeinsam Hilfestellungen zu bieten. Damit bietet der Workshop Nachwuchswissenschaftler:innen Raum, offene Fragen zu stellen und zeitgleich  Peers zu finden, die an gleichen Thematiken arbeiten beziehungsweise vor ähnlichen Problemen stehen. 

Panel organisers:
Conrad Schetter (BICC Bonn)
Claudia Derichs (HU Berlin)
Andrea Fleschenberg (HU Berlin)
Ann Philipp (ABI Freiburg)

The year 2024 was designated to the theme of “academic freedom” in Germany. A huge number of academic institutions, organizations, foundations, think tanks and the like devoted events and debates to this topic. Questions that were raised touched upon the commitment to academic freedom, on developments that—de facto or potentially—endanger this commitment, and the limitations of actually implementing it. Critical perspectives related to empirical findings that reveal the difficulties of this implementation with regard to the diversity of scholars working in Germany, many of whom hail from Asian countries. A roundtable at the DGA conference in Rostock already addressed the challenges that several of these scholars have to face, and that render the notion of “freedom” a bit doubtful. The panel proposed for the DGA conference in Bonn is meant to follow up on the previous one and asks: What are the take aways from the “academic freedom year” for our work with and work on Asia? What are the lessons learned and who has learned from whom—or who can and should learn from whom? How do restrictions of free research affect our work as Asia scholars?

Panelorganisator:innen:
Wolfram Schaffar (University of Passau)
Min Htin Kaw Lat (University of Passau)

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has played an important role in public discourse worldwide for several years now. AI is perceived as a key technology that is expected to profoundly change and revolutionize not only the economy but also society. In many regions of Asia, the adaptation of AI is characterized by several dynamics: On the one hand, the decisive steps in the research and development of AI are being taken by the two leading industrialized nations—the USA and China. Most other countries in Asia (as well as Europe) are only contributors to larger development projects, as suppliers of data and as markets. On the other hand, many Asian regions play a very important role in this peripheral position: South and Southeast Asia, for example, are leading the world in terms of social and economic penetration with digital technologies and social media. This makes them a very lucrative market and an interesting laboratory for various AI applications. Against the backdrop of increasing US-Chinese competition, different regions in Asia are becoming the arena of geostrategic rivalry between the two technology superpowers, where the integration of countries into one sphere or the other has far-reaching consequences. 

Apart from the often utopian future scenarios, researchers have pointed out that AI also bears traits of an extractivist industry due to its resource-intensive and labour-intensive foundations. In addition to the raw materials required for the technical devices and infrastructure, and in addition to the enormous energy consumption of the servers, many applications such as image recognition or large language models depend on massive input of human labour (e.g. tagging images and entering data), which is increasingly being outsourced to low-wage countries or performed via platformized work. In these areas, global inequality is reproduced and reinforced. 

The panel will provide a forum to discuss the dynamics of adaptation and the role of AI in Asia at different levels, which include but are not limited to questions such as:

• What economic dynamics can be observed? 
• What geostrategic developments are associated with the adaptation of AI in the different Asian regions?
• Which players can be identified—investment funds, companies, users?
• What regulatory initiatives are being undertaken by governments?

Panel organisers:
Anno Dederichs (Sun Yat-sen University)
Ruirui Zhou (University of Hamburg)

In the social sciences, the dissolution of the Cold War bloc formation in the 1980s initiated a significant “spatial turn”, and spatialization as a method of postmodernism replaced the dominant focus on the time perspective of modernity. Among other things, postmodern approaches viewed space as social constructs permeated by power dynamics and hierarchy. The renewed focus on space was accompanied by the recognition of globalization and of a placelessness caused by communication technologies and mobility. Even before the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, a trend of a resurgence of territorialization became visible, which gained further momentum with the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022 and also contributed to a new geopoliticization in Germany. However, the framing of this shift as a “Zeitenwende” reflects a Eurocentric perspective, one that is not necessarily shared by states in the Global South. At the same time, some ‘permanences of space’ seem to be confirmed: renewed bloc formation between East and West (such as in the economic war between the USA and China that began under Trump in 2017), reinforcement of the North-South divisions (such as during the COVID-19 pandemic), rising nationalism, and the pursuit of hegemonic control of space and remaining resources. The construction of new spaces and new spatial differences appear as synchronous phenomena.

These geopolitical discourses not only shape the construction of spaces but also redefine the significance of categories of belonging associated with territorial origin. Economic spaces undergo a geopolitical reinterpretation, so much so that there is already talk of de-globalization; the freedom and diversity of scientific exchange are subjected to territorial reservations; technologically enabled transcultural spaces are to be territorially disentangled again, triggering digital migration (TikTok; Xiaohongshu); and the design of social spaces is interpreted and experienced differently by the global players—primarily the USA, China, and Europe.

The panel goes beyond merely diagnosing current political spatial dynamics and seeks to critically engage with the transformation of spatial constructions. The panel is open to a wide range of contributions from the social and cultural sciences, political science, economics, regional studies, and linguistics.

Panelorganisator:innen:
Jonas Schmid (Universität Heidelberg)
Stefanie Elbern (Universität Heidelberg)

Mit dem Aufstieg Chinas zur Weltmacht rückt China zunehmend in den Fokus gesellschaftlicher und politischer Diskurse und medialer Berichterstattung. Dabei werden einer breiten Öffentlichkeit Chinabilder vermittelt, die teils stark von aktuellen Emotionalitäten und Interessenslagen geprägt sind und nicht selten fernab wissenschaftlicher Erkenntnisse liegen. 

In diesem Panel sollen mediale Chinabilder analysiert werden. Inwiefern haben diese sich in verschiedenen Medien entwickelt? Welche historischen Kontinuitäten und gegenwärtigen Besonderheiten lassen sich beobachten? Inwiefern unterscheiden sich Chinabilder in verschiedenen Medien, etwa in der medialen Berichterstattung herkömmlicher Tageszeitungen, in den sozialen Medien und in Schulbüchern? Welche Unterschiede lassen sich eventuell auch zwischen Chinabildern in unterschiedlichen Ländern und Kontinenten beobachten? 

Ausgerichtet wird dieses Panel von Mitarbeiter:innen des BMBF-Projektes „China-Schul-Akademie“: Trotz der gesteigerten medialen Aufmerksamkeit bleibt China zufolge einer Merics-Studie von 2018 „für den Großteil der rund elf Millionen Schüler in Deutschland […] ein Randthema.“ In ihren Vorträgen stellen die Mitarbeiter:innen der China-Schul-Akademie die Ergebnisse einer systematischen Erhebung und umfassenden quantitativen und qualitativen Analyse von China-Bezügen in den bundesweit aktuell gültigen Lehrplänen der Fächer Geschichte, Geografie/Erdkunde, Sozialkunde und Ethik/Religion vor. Zudem wurde ein repräsentatives Korpus von Schulbüchern der genannten Fächer aus den letzten 10 Jahren (2013–2023) zusammengestellt und die Auswahl von Fallbeispielen, das Quellenangebot und die Bildsprache untersucht. Basierend auf den Ergebnissen der Studie und dem im Projektverlauf gesammelten Erfahrungen werden Empfehlungen für Lehrplankommissionen, Schulbuchredaktionen und -autor:innen, Fachdidaktiker:innen, Lehrer:innen und nicht zuletzt für die Chinawissenschaften formuliert. 

Weitere Beiträge zu Chinabildern (nicht nur in deutschsprachigen) Medien sind willkommen und sollen zur breiteren Diskussion der Frage beitragen, inwiefern und wie „mehr Perspektiven“ auf China gewagt und „mehr Perspektiven“ aus China präsentiert werden können. 

Panelorganisator:innen:
Andriani Nangoy (Universität Bonn)
Xuan Hang Nguyen (Universität Bonn)

Die Vermittlung von Sprachen ist ein Kern der Regionalwissenschaften. Die sichere Beherrschung einer Sprache ist zentrale Voraussetzung, um eine Region und ihre gesellschaftlichen, kulturellen und politischen Verhältnisse zu verstehen und zu erforschen. In den letzten Jahren hat sich die Sprachvermittlung – wie im Grunde genommen alle Bereiche der universitären Lehre und Forschung – jedoch stark verändert. Sinkende Studierendenzahlen und kleinere Sprachkurse erfordern Flexibilität. Für anwendungsbezogenen Sprachunterricht müssen oftmals neue didaktische Konzepte und Materialien erarbeitet werden. Durch die Digitalisierung hat sich der Methodenkasten im Sprachunterricht erheblich erweitert, etwa durch ein großes Angebot an Video- und Audioelementen, durch interaktive Übungen und Vokabeltrainer. Auch können trotz räumlicher Trennung und über Zeitzonen hinweg Sprach-Tandems gebildet werden und Inhalte in einer fremden Sprache und Kultur sind oft nur einen Klick weit entfernt. In dem Workshop wollen wir uns über aktuelle Situationen des Sprachunterrichts in den Regionalwissenschaften austauschen, Schwierigkeiten diskutieren und Lösungsmöglichkeiten vorstellen. Bei Interesse können die Lektorinnen Andriani Nangoy und Xuan Hang Nguyen die Möglichkeiten und Schwierigkeiten des digitalen Spracherwerbs am Beispiel des Vietnamesischen und Indonesischen vorstellen. Darüber hinaus dient der Workshop auch zur zukünftigen Vernetzung. 

Panel organisers:
Igor Severnad (University of Duisburg-Essen)
Mark Philip Stadler (University of Bonn)
Annika Clasen (University of Düsseldorf)
David Adebahr (Kobe University)

This panel assembles diverse perspectives and case studies to critically assess how the Indo-Pacific is navigating transformative changes amid the on-going China-US strategic competition. As China has been evolving from a rising power to a great power, its influence continues to grow, while US presence appears increasingly uncertain. This panel therefore grapples with the capacities and strategies of Indo-Pacific nations, as they confront contemporary challenges in an increasing multipolar world. Particularly, China in the wake of its self-proclaimed “peaceful rise” is of notable significance, as it has developed a governance model centralized on power and entrenched in authoritarian structures while too emphasizing its commitment to good governance and cooperation. These internal designs shape the country’s international posture, influencing both its Indo-Pacific diplomacy and Beijing’s strategic behaviour amid the increasing great power competition. These internal designs also shape the country’s international posture through externalization, from great power diplomacy and periphery diplomacy in the Indo-Pacific, to Beijing’s strategic behavior amid intensifying great power competition in the region and globally.

Simultaneously, the Indo-Pacific nations are facing an increasingly unstable environment. Intensifying territorial and maritime disputes have led to closer regional cooperation and the development of alternative structures to respond to this unstable environment. But how effective will these be in mitigating China’s assertiveness and an unreliable US partner in the future? While realist studies tend to focus on great power competition, they often neglect the strategies of middle and small powers. For this reason, this panel pays closer attention to such approaches as ASEAN centrality, AUKUS, the East Asian Community, and other forms of cooperation between Indo-Pacific states such as Indonesia and Japan.

The panel addresses questions central to current Asian and security studies: How does great power competition inform domestic politics and regional cooperation? How do narratives of legitimacy, status, modernity, and development shape the regional and global order? How do the Indo-Pacific states engage with institutional frameworks beyond or within either the US-led or China-led international order? Are there viable alternatives to the US-led framework, and if so, how are these alternatives being conceptualized and implemented? By integrating conceptual and methodological approaches from various fields, this panel promises a nuanced examination of a contested order in the Indo-Pacific and the respective reactions of regional actors. Through roundtable discussions, paper presentations, and interactive exchanges, the panel seeks to foster robust academic dialogue aligned with the conference’s goal of advancing innovative scholarship and enhancing interdisciplinary collaborative networks.

Panel organisers:
Michaela Doutch (University of Bonn)
Oliver Pye (University of Bonn)
Kartika Manurung (University of Bonn)

The central role of Asia in the Global Production Networks (GPNs) that now dominate the global economy is well established. Asian countries are not only starting or central processing points for many GPNs such as the garment industry, palm oil, or electronics. East Asian and Chinese capital increasingly shapes downstream further processing, high-tech production, and research and development. This is connected to an ongoing and radical transformation of the built environment—the Chinese Belt and Road Initiative is the best example. Asian-centred GPNs are thus transforming Asian societies—economically, socially, politically and culturally. However, mainstream economic geography, with its focus on lead firms, suppliers, value capture and managerial perspectives often neglect or erase from the picture the lives and experiences of the workers who re/produce them. 

This panel aims to unpack the black box of the businesses along the supply chains to look at the new proletariats across Asia. Which groups of workers are involved at different production stages and locations of different GPNs? What different labour regimes characterize the supply chain in different locations? How is social reproduction spatially different and linked to spaces of production? What crises and conflicts arise around the re/production of labour? What socio-ecological problems become visible in GPNs? What organizing initiatives and collective struggles can be observed? What transnational organizing strategies and Asian-wide networking are emerging?

Panelorganisator:
Wiegand Körber (Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg)

Im Oktober des vergangenen Jahres war es dann endlich so weit: Übereinstimmend berichteten Medien, dass die Neuauflage des indischen Zensus für das Jahr 2025 geplant sei; 2026 rechne man mit Ergebnissen. Weiterhin unklar ist jedoch, ob im Zensus die Kategorie caste erhoben wird, die Frage ist umstritten. Befürworter:innen weisen darauf hin, dass solche Daten notwendig sind, um soziale Gerechtigkeit gezielt umzusetzen und Diskriminierung sichtbar zu machen. Gegner:innen argumentieren, dass die Offenlegung von caste gesellschaftliche Spaltungen vertiefe und Begehrlichkeiten nach zusätzlichen Quotierungen befördere. Der Zensus ist der Klassiker der Auseinandersetzung um einen Datensatz mit enormer politischer Bedeutung, insbesondere in den hochgradig stratifizierten Gesellschaften Südasiens. Doch auch darüber hinaus ist eine Zunahme von Diskursen um und mit Zahlen in vielen Politikfeldern zu beobachten, was vor dem Hintergrund eines immer größer werdenden Volumens an verfügbaren Daten nur konsequent ist. In dem Maße aber, in dem Daten als Grundlage von politischen Entscheidungen und zum Argument für Machtverhältnisse Prävalenz erfahren, steigt die Bedeutung der Daten selbst – und auch die Bedeutung derer, die sie sammeln, kompilieren und in Zahlen verwandeln. 

Die drei bereits für das Panel feststehenden Vorträge widmen sich ausgewählten Aspekten dieses vielschichtigen Forschungsfeldes: Wiegand Körber untersucht den SDG India Index, ein datenbasiertes Governance-Instrument, das die Leistung indischer Bundesstaaten bei der Erreichung der Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) misst und vergleicht, um einen Wettbewerbsföderalismus zu fördern, wobei der Index zunehmend in Verteilungskämpfen eingesetzt wird. Pierre Gottschlich konzentriert sich auf die numerische Erfassung der indischen Diaspora und analysiert die Praktiken der statistisch untermauerten Konstruktion von Zugehörigkeiten und kollektiven Identitäten. Clemens Jürgenmeyer analysiert die Wahlergebnisse der BJP in den südlichen Bundesstaaten, um zu zeigen, wie eine oberflächliche Betrachtung zu falschen Einschätzungen der tatsächlichen Stärke der Parteien führen kann.

Das Panel ist offen für Beiträge aller Disziplinen und für Fallbeispiele jenseits Südasiens. Weitere Teilnehmer:innen sind entsprechend herzlich willkommen.